What Makes a QA Consultancy Truly Independent?
There is a conflict of interest at the heart of most QA consulting. When the same firm that tests your software also sells the testing tools, trains your staff on their proprietary platform, and earns recurring licence fees from the stack they recommend — their advice is not independent. It cannot be.
True independence in QA means three things: no proprietary tools to sell, separation from delivery, and no recurring revenue dependency. Resync was founded in 2019 specifically to deliver this. We have one client interest to serve: yours.
The Resync Independence Model
- Founded 2019 by Renee Kerslake — specifically to bring genuinely independent QA to NZ
- 70+ engineers across New Zealand, embedded without delivery allegiance
- All-of-Government (AoG) Marketplace approved supplier
- Tool-agnostic — Playwright, Selenium, Tricentis, UiPath, k6, JMeter, Postman
- Sector experience: government, banking, insurance, energy, healthcare, retail
Why Does This Matter?
Quality assurance is meant to be the honest answer to “is this software ready?” When the tester has a financial interest in the answer being yes — that honesty is compromised.
New Zealand’s largest programmes — core banking transformations, government digital services, regulated platform migrations — cannot afford compromised QA. The cost of a production defect in a banking system or government payments platform is not just financial. It is reputational, regulatory, and sometimes human.
Independent QA is not a premium. It is the baseline for programmes where quality actually matters.
